(Detroit/Ann Arbor) HMOs in Michigan
increased their enrollment for the first time in 10 years in 2009 and enjoyed
strong profits as well. However, fewer people had insurance through employer
group plans and Medicaid and other public programs covered more.
These
and other findings, based on an analysis of the finances and enrollment trends
of Michigan's health insurance companies, are reported in Part One of Michigan Health Market Review 2010,
released here today. This is the 14th annual Michigan market study,
first published in 1997 by Allan Baumgarten, an independent analyst and consultant
based in Minnesota. Later this year, the Part Two report will analyze hospital
profitability and utilization and compare HMOs on utilization and quality of
care measures. He has also published annual market reports in Arizona,
California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Minnesota, New York, Ohio,
Texas and Wisconsin.
Among
the findings in the 2010 report:
Enrollment in Michigan HMOs increased by
4.5% in 2009, as Medicaid HMOs added 150,000 new members. About 45% of the
state's 2.6 million HMO enrollees are in Medicaid plans, while enrollment in
HMO employer plans has dropped to 1.3 million, its lowest level since the early
1990s. Employers have departed for plans that are less comprehensive and less
expensive or have dropped coverage altogether.
On average, Michigan HMOs had margins of 2%
in 2009. They had net income of $195.7 million, less than in 2008 when they
earned net income of $226 million, or 2.6% of premiums.
Medicaid plans were especially profitable,
with HMOs posting net income of $97.4 million. On average, Medicaid HMOs
spent 83.2% of each premium dollar for medical expenses in 2009.And Medicaid
plans will gain numerous new customers when health reform is implemented.
Commercial
premium revenues increased by an average of 2.7% in 2009, from $300 to $308 per
member per month. That was the lowest increase in the past 10 years. Still
Michigan employers paid $62 more per member per month in 2009 than in 2004.
Medical expenses for employer groups increased by 4.9%, resulting in lower
profits on that line of business.
Enrollment in Medicare Advantage HMOs increased
again, though it is still less than 10% of seniors. About 85,000 seniors
were still enrolled in private fee-for-service plans in January 2010. Those
plans are shutting down because of new federal requirements. Some of those
seniors are apparently choosing HMO plans while others, who want broader choice
of physicians, are probably returning to Medicare Supplement plans.
Excerpts from the report, including
the helpful "Michigan HMOs at a Glance" page can be viewed at www.AllanBaumgarten.com.
Free PDF downloads of previous reports for Arizona, California, Kentucky, New York and
Texas are also available there. A subscription to Michigan Health Market Review 2010, including both Parts One and
Two, can be ordered from Allan Baumgarten for $160.00. Call 952/925-9121 or fax
952/925-9341. E-mail address: Baumg010@tc.umn.edu
-End-
March 29, 2010
Part
Two of Michigan Health Market 2009 is
released this week.
Below you will find a brief summary of the report, which
analyzes hospital profitability and utilization using 2008 data and updates
enrollment information and financial results for Michigan health plans through
June 2009. Part One of Michigan Health Market Review 2010 will be released in July. The 2010 report will be the
14th annual edition of the Michigan market analysis, which was first published
in 1997.
The
economic downturn, which has hit Michigan especially hard, is taking a toll on
health insurers and hospitals.The
report finds:
After
six straight years of improving profitability, Detroit-area hospital saw their
profits plunge in 2008 and 2009. Based on data from Medicare cost reports
for 2008 fiscal years, hospitals in the area lost $77.6 million, or 0.8% of net
patient revenues of $9.5 billion.By comparison, they had net income in 2007 of $213.4 million, or 2.3% of
net patient revenues. That compares to net income of $191.5 million in 2006
(2.2% of net patient revenues) and $163.2 million in 2005 (2.0%). (See
Exhibits 4 and 5)One
major difference is the decline of other revenues (investment income,
philanthropy and government grants) from $689 million in 2007 to $357 million
in 2008. And in what might be a sign of 2009 results, the St. John hospitals
lost $49 million in their fiscal year ending June 30, 2009.
Net
income also fell at 33 large hospitals in other parts of the state. Those
hospitals had average margins of less than 1%, down from 10.2% in 2007 and 8.4%
in 2006.(See Exhibit 6)
Inpatient hospital days at Detroit area hospitals declined by almost 2% in
2008. Rising unemployment, declining
population and the growth of high deductible plans are exerting downward
pressure on utilization. (See Exhibit 7) People without coverage
or who must satisfy high deductibles are likely deferring elective procedures.
The 2009 opening of new hospitals in Novi and West Bloomfield created new
capacity. And the announced acquisition of the Detroit Medical Center hospitals
by Vanguard, an investor-owned company, means more competition for a shrinking
pie of hospital volume.
After
consecutive years of decline, enrollment in Michigan HMOs increased slightly in
the first half of 2009. Commercial HMO
membership continued to decline, particularly from Blue Care Network and Health
Alliance Plan. But enrollment in Medicaid HMO plans (and Medicaid generally)
grew. Medicaid HMOs added about 112,000 enrollees in the 18 months through June
2009 and now account for43% of
all HMO enrollees in the state.
HMOs
reported lower net income for the first half of 2009. Michigan HMOs had net income of $70 million through
June 2009, or 1.5% of underwriting revenues. In 2008, the average margin was
2.6%.